4th December
2009
written by Laura Vanderkam

I have an essay on the Taste page of the Wall Street Journal today called “Seen and Not Heard in Church.” Judging from the comments page on the website, this topic — whether children should attend worship services — gets people a little riled up one way or the other!

4 Comments

  1. John
    04/12/2009

    Your comments in the WSJ remind me of when we converted from a certain traditional church of the West to the Orthodox Church. By sharing, I wish to encourage you. Children do belong in church… all will the better educated, more spiritually engaged. The child learns that prayer is an essential part of living as the parent’s model and teach by doing.

    Our services are relatively long by western standards, a normal Sunday service running from anywhere from 1.5 to 2.5+ hours, depending upon how a particular jurisdiction handles the rite.

    These are not simple services. Largely unchanged since the 9th Century, the ritual actions are far more complicated than the pre-Vatican II or even pre-Trent rites. Far from dummded-down, the services are very complex theological expressions, with many complicated Biblical references, polysyllabic theological terms, and, often an older style of English and, in many parishes, healthy amounts of the service may be in Arabic, Greek, or Slavonic…with little actually spoken, all parts (priest, deacon, and choir) being chanted even for simple services. Then there is the additional challenge of standing. Orthodox Christians stand to pray. So even though many parishes do provide seating for the numerous, sometime lengthy litanies, the more traditional parishes do not, one can easily count on standing for some very long streches.

    Yet, children are never excluded from any of the services; indeed, it is considered an error to do so. From baptism, children participate and receive the administration of the sacrament (mysteries). This is the traditional practice in the Christian West as well as the East. The East never had reason to change. The change in the West is a very late development but rooted in the placing of the emphasis on the homily and preaching during the Reformation period, which is when pews were introduced.

    Coming from a western church parish that was very fussy and clear about children being not wanted in services (to say the least), yet myself having two small, very active boys, I expected problems.

    Shockingly, happily, we experienced the opposite; everyone was quiet clam about it and my children acquired taste for the services and have grown to love and know them.

    What we also observed was that parents, especially newer mothers, were not actually burdened with babies… not because there were none, but babies are movable! They were shared out! Other mothers and fathers literally go over and take them …while many teenage girls seem unable to allow a baby go unheld..by them. The babies seem to think they are in heaven with all the attention, while mothers and fathers were able to actually pray. What a relief; it is not possible to raise children and not pray… a lot… Children need to see/experience it, just as they need to see parents going to confession and really change behavior as a result.

    Recently we moved to a very traditional cathedral parish where services can run long (three hours or more of a bishop comes). There are a few benches on the sides for elderly but, in practice, most everyone stands the entire time. Yet, there are many small children.

    Again, I expected problems; again, I was wrong! Without pews, it is easier for the children to move, to sit on the floor, or for parents to take a rare fussy child out. And the moveable baby phenomenon….well, it flourishes, and just which baby will be brought to communion by whom is always interesting. Far from tedium, the level of engagement by everyone is very high. The entire community of the faithful its self is more complete and, obviously, without any compromise in the rites or services or the Church.

    As with any other type of nutrition and education, children actually do crave to “taste and see that the Lord is good,” what the adult way to live really is, and that none are able to stand, except by and through an active faith in God.

    I hope my account is edifying and not cause vilification.

  2. 04/12/2009

    This is also cultural. For example in the Catholic Church the white, English-language services are pretty child free and children are expected — thought it is not really stated — to be quiet. In the Spanish-language masses in the same church, there are more children, they are louder and more visible and this is cultural and very interesting. Children in Anglo-America (and in corporate America) are not supposed to be seen or heard. But in Latin culture, children are seen as a blessing and a joy and their noises and participation part of life and the culture is what I would call child-focused or child-centered. While this has its down sides it seems more Christian to me.

  3. Nancy
    05/12/2009

    My husband is hearing-impaired and wears hearing aids. The amplified sounds of children fussing, squealing, whimpering, whatever. . . are very unpleasant for him, almost to the point of discomfort. We had been attending a church where most of adults thought children’s noises in the the worship service were just great. We stopped attending.

  4. Mike Boyette
    21/12/2009

    Your article reads like a bad term paper: Drawing a conclusion first, then ponying up material to support it.
    You chose the Passover, a Jewish institution, to illustrate the acceptance of kinder participation in religious activities. Rather mystifying, for the Seder is one of the most residential of services. Patriarchs recline (if possible), and (only)the eldest child asks the Four Questions. No doubt there are public Seders which children attend, and one assumes you have a specific one in mind. However, one of the problems with using anecdotes to generalize is the question of if they really can be used for such a purpose. Many other Jewish celebrations, such as Simchat Torah of Succoth would have been much better examples.

Leave a Reply